|
Termination:
A Recipe For Disaster
A
construction contract termination can be a disaster
for everyone involved; the subcontractor, the general
contractor and the owner. Often a contractor terminates
a subcontractor without appreciating both the benefits
and the risks.
Timeliness
Too frequently contractors act too quickly, terminating
impulsively. But delaying termination may also cause
problems. Excessive delay gives the impression that
the work or pace of the project may actually have been
acceptable. Any decision to terminate must be timely,
well considered and appropriately enacted.
If
you decide terminating a subcontractor is the best solution,
read and follow the procedures set forth in your contract.
Involve your company CEO in the decision. The CEO should
assess the potential costs and the necessity for legal
advice. Be sure the benefits outweigh the costs.
Documentation
Statistics show every contractor, eventually, will face
a subcontractor termination. Because of this, all projects
need crucial documentation to protect the contractor's
resources. Always, document the condition of the project
as it progresses, not just when you are faced with a
need to terminate. Prior to terminating, document the
justification for the termination.
The
Costs
Termination is not cost free. In addition to the cost
of completing the work, the contractor may face other
costs of termination, such as:
 |
Securing
work and materials |
 |
Demobilization
|
 |
Cancellation
costs of purchase order and subcontracts cost of
material fabricated but not used |
 |
Some
recognition of earned profit, and possibly |
 |
Cost
of idle personnel |
Indirect
costs may be even more extensive. How will this termination
affect your relationship with your customer or project
owner? Will it impact potential business?
The
Pitfalls
Do not simply hide behind the subcontract. Under Texas
law, if a general contractor is found to be in breach
of the subcontract, the contractor cannot rely on favorable
procedural and exculpatory provisions.
Terminating
a subcontractor prior to substation completion gives
the subcontractor the opportunity to sue for breach.
If breach is proven, the subcontractor can recover damages
on a total cost basis. That is, the subcontractor could
receive compensation for all costs incurred, not limited
to the value of the work.
Also,
consider the consequences to a subcontractor's business
when they are obligated to reveal terminations to future
customers that may look unfavorably on all terminations.
Wrongfully terminating a subcontractor exposes the contractor
to consequential damages, such as lost opportunity cost
or liability for the subcontractor's business failure.
Finally, a contractor found to have wrongfully terminated
a subcontractor will have to reimburse the subcontractor
for its legal fees.
The
Alternatives
Is termination worthwhile in view of the legal and job
risks? There are times termination is the only answer;
such as when the subcontractor abandons the project
the project and/or is insolvent.
Think
about how third parties may view the termination. Juries
and arbitrators will want to know what the general contractor
did to avoid the termination. They will ask, "What
did you do to help the subcontractor in trouble?"
You need to be able to say, "A Whole lot."
Then, you must give specific and detailed evidence.
Consider
all the alternatives to termination:
 |
Supplementing
the subcontractor's management, labor or equipment
resources |
 |
Providing
administrative assistance |
 |
Reducing
the contractual scope of work |
 |
Providing
financial controls or financing to completion |
[By the way, don't let the existence of a performance
bond give you a false sense of security and color decision
making. The bond is a financial guarantee that assures
the subcontractor's obligations will be performed. Depending
on the form of the bond used, some sureties in a termination
situation will investigate without regard to project
schedule. Often the general contractor has to complete
the work and only then settle with the bond company.]
Why
work with a struggling subcontractor?
The benefits of working with a struggling subcontractor
are many. They include avoiding:
 |
Lawsuits, |
 |
Claim
against bond, |
 |
Angry
owner, |
 |
Mechanic's
liens, |
 |
Massive
disruption, |
 |
Termination
costs, and |
 |
Potential
damage to a hard-earned business reputation |
___________________________________________
The following article appeared in the Texas Contractor.
by
Mary Jo Poindexter, P.E., President of Engineered Construction
Specialists, Inc., a construction management firm in
Houston, and William K. Andrews, a shareholder with
the law firm of Anders Myers and Donaldson, P.C., with
offices in Houston and Beaumont
|